Newly elected Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema refused to be sworn in on a Bible, opting, instead, to place her right hand on a book of laws, including the U.S Constitution and the Arizona Constitution.
Looking past the immediate low-hanging ironic fruit of her last name,
SINema, let's move right onto the main topic at hand. Since this nation was founded in 1776, everyone who has come into office has been
sworn in on the Holy Bible, with very few exceptions. But the election of 2018 has produced a radical shift away from a focus on God and the Bible as our lawgiver, and on to a
godless, completely secular worldview that doesn't even pretend to honor God. This is the new crop of politicians we have coming up.
"Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened." Romans 1:21 (KJV)
We have two female Democrat Muslims who
hate the Jews and Israel, and a law on the books for the past 181 years concerning the
wearing of head coverings on the House floor is being changed to accommodate their belief in Islam and Sharia Law. Make no mistake about it, the foundations on which this nation was founded are shifting right now, and the only question is how far will they shift before what our Founding Fathers started ceases to exist?
Democrat Sen. Kyrsten Sinema Refuses to Take Oath of Office on Bible
FROM BREITBART NEWS: The book Sen. Sinema placed her hand on to be sworn in came from the Library of Congress, her office told the Arizona Republic.
“Kyrsten always gets sworn in on a Constitution simply because of her love for the Constitution,” the senator’s office said.
There is at least one other reason Sinema refused to place her hand on the Bible. According to the Pew Research Center for Religion and Public Life, the Arizonan is the only member of the Senate who does not identify as a member of a religion.
Sinema, who started her political career as a member of the Green Party, also identifies as bisexual. She is only the second member of the Senate to identify as LGBTQ.
Despite her current claim to love the U.S. Constitution, in her work with left-wing groups in the early 2000s, Sinema was far less solicitous of the law of the land. In fact, she was quoted in 2002 as saying she thought it was acceptable that anarchists and Antifa types perpetrated violence, carried weapons, and destroyed property in pursuit of the extremist goals.
“When AAPJ attended May Day (sponsored by the Phoenix Anarchist Coalition), we knew that their guidelines differ from ours,” the Washington Examiner wrote of an email Sinema sent in 2002. “They are okay with weapons and property destruction in some instances, and so those of us who chose to attend the event knew that it would be inappropriate to ask someone to not destroy property or to carry a weapon.”
READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment