THE COMING MIDDLE EAST WAR - THE HARD LEFT AND ISLAM - FBI DIRECTOR REMOVED AND MANY MORE CUTTING EDGE UPDATES FROM DR JOHN McTERNAN!!

Updates from

John McTernan's Insights



In the 01/31/2018 edition:

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe ‘removed’ from the bureau

By John McTernan 
This is huge because McCabe was removed after the FBI Director read Representative Nunes memo! Wow! This memo must be power packed. I hope more of these swamp critters are dragged out of the FBI and Justice Department, and if possible out of the CIA.
Read in browser »

Recent Articles:


American Exceptionalism: the Church
YouTube Thursday Night: “Pastor Fred Bible Teaching and Prayer for Outpouring of the Holy Spirit”

Monday, 29 January 2018

Christians Debate Trumps Impact On Sharing Faith


Trump
 
Christians Debate Trumps Impact On Sharing Faith
 
Evangelicals are finding themselves being judged on the character and accomplishments of our president rather than on the character and accomplishments of our Lord.
 

New Project Uses Original Records From Time of Christ Which Proves That LOTS of Meaning Has Been Stripped From Your English Bible!!

 
Project Uses Original Records From Time of Christ. Proves LOTS of Meaning Has Been Stripped From Your English Bible!
 
The 20-year long “Pure Word” project, along with teams in the hermeneutics and theological research community, have been discovering that our English versions of the New Testament, beginning in the 1,500s AD, are riddled with not only direct translation errors, but intentional omissions and changes in meaning from the scholars themselves due to cultural and political influence of the time – and yes, this even effects the 1611 KJV. A small known fact is one of the lead scholars on The Pure Word translation team (who was in the KJV-only camp) wept upon confirming this discovery.
 
Some may immediately rejected this fact, but it’s important to remember the following. Greek, the language that the New Testament was originally recorded, by design, is a complex language that incorporates depths-of-meaning with each word that simply does not exist in English. So, by default, Greek scripture had to be watered down when translated to English to comply with grammatical rules.
 
But if only it stopped there. Using the 1611 KJV as an example, the scholars were also required to follow certain rules by the King; one of which was to not contradict the "Bishop’s Bible", which again, resulted in deliberate changes in scripture to comply with Roman Catholicism. Even so, the KJV is arguably the most accurate version of the Bible in English we have today, and the scholars involved were clearly God fearing individuals with the best of intentions, but to say it presents the full depth-of-meaning that the original Greek scriptures contained within in the New Testament, is just simply not true.
 
Once this discovery was made through historical records, and easily confirmed by directly comparing the original Koine Greek to virtually all existing English translations, The Pure Word research project proceeded to re-translate the New Testament from the complete and original Greek records with new patent-pending hermeneutics-based tools that would bypass all individual opinions, cultural and political influences to once-and-for-all create a New Testament English translations that re-implements much of the original Greek meaning!
 
But there's a catch. Due to the raw method in which The Pure Word had to be translated to retain the Greek meaning, it can sometimes be difficult to read. As a result, The Pure Word is NOT meant to replace your favorite version of the Bible, but to be used alongside it just as you would use a Strong's Dictionary, a concordance or a commentary! Think of The Pure Word as an invaluable resource or tool that every scholar, pastor and Bible study group should use.
 
Follow the video button below to see a direct KJV vs The Pure Word scripture comparison!
 
WATCH VIDEO

THERE IS JUST NO PLEASING SOME RADICAL MUSLIMS!! THEY NOW OPPOSE THE APPOINTMENT OF A MUSLIM LADY TO BE THE GOVERNMENT HEAD OF ANTI-EXTREMISM BECAUSE SHE IS TOO MUCH AGAINST THEM!!

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM WITH THE NEW HEAD OF ANTI-EXTREMISM ? SHE’S TOO ANTI-EXTREMISM!
BY MELANIE PHILLIPS
The British government has appointed a lead commissioner for the new Commission for Countering Extremism. She is Sara Khan, a British Muslim human rights activist and the chief executive of Inspire, an organisation she founded in 2008 to fight extremism and gender inequality. The decision to set up this commission followed the Manchester bombing, one of five terror attacks in Britain in 2017. The commission’s remit is to identify and challenge all forms of extremism, advise ministers on anti-extremist policies and promote “pluralistic British values”.

Sara Khan has a track record of promoting social justice and harmony in the face of those who would destroy them. She encourages Muslim integration into British society. She says Muslims should obey the same laws as everyone else and has called for honesty among Muslims about hateful ideologies and intolerant practices amongst their number. Her opposition to the government’s badly flawed counter-extremism bill, meanwhile, showed that she’s no government patsy. Sara Khan would therefore seem to be an excellent choice to advise the government on countering extremism. Her views couldn’t possibly be considered controversial except by extremists and their apologists. So what’s the reaction of numerous supposedly moderate British Muslim organisations and individuals? Horror!
The problem seems to be that she has supported the government’s Prevent programme. Prevent is designed to counter Islamic extremism. It would therefore seem somewhat appropriate for the newly designated anti-extremism commissioner to have expressed support for the government’s anti-Islamic extremism programme, no? No! A number of Muslim organisations are calling for her to be sacked and saying they won’t work with her.
Harun Khan, the secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The fight against terrorism requires equal partnership between all parties, including Muslim communities.This appointment risks sending a clear and alarming message that the government has no intention of doing so.” The former Conservative party chairman, Sayeeda Warsi, says Sara Khan is divisive and the appointment is “deeply disturbing”. The occupant of such a role, says Baroness Warsi, needs to be “connected to and respected by a cross-section of British Muslims”; but “Sara is sadly seen by many as simply a creation of and mouthpiece for the Home Office.”
Labour MP Naz Shah, vice-chaiman of the British Muslims all-party group, said: “Here we have somebody who does not accept the concerns in the community.” No mention by Naz Shah of concerns about some members of that community – concerns which led to the creation of the commission and Sara Khan’s appointment in the first place. Presumably that’s what “critics on social media” mean when they claim she has been appointed to run a “structurally Islamophobic authoritarian thought policing commission”.

The problem with appointing Sara Khan as the anti-extremism commissioner would therefore seem to be that she is too… well, anti-extremism. This of course tells us nothing about Sara Khan. It does, however, tell us rather a lot about these “moderate” complainants – and, if their own words are correct, about the broader Muslim community too. And none of that is good.

Tuesday, 16 January 2018

THE USA DEPLOYS AN ELECTRONIC WARFARE AIRCRAFT TO THE KOREN PENINSULA!!

U.S. Deploys Electronic Warfare Aircraft To Korean Peninsula
  
The United States Air Force has deployed an aircraft designed for electronic warfare to the Korean Peninsula. As reported by The Aviationist Monday, an EC-130H Compass Call aircraft recently left Japan’s Yokota Air Base and arrived at Osan Air Base in South Korea.



According to the U.S. Air Force, the Compass Call, which landed in Japan on Jan. 4 after travelling from Arizona’s Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, is capable of delivering precision electronic attacks to disrupt enemy communications.
“Compass Call is the Air Force’s premier electronic attack platform,” Lt. Col. Matthew Cunningham, an EC-130 aircraft commander, said last August. “It is the CFACC’s only autonomous communications jamming, electronic attack asset. This unique autonomy is attributed to a crew of about a dozen highly-specialised, competent Airmen.”
The aircraft, a modified C-130 Hercules, has most recently been used against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria as part of Operation Inherent Resolve. The Aviationist’s David Cenciotti notes that the reason behind the deployment currently remains unknown.
“Obviously, we can’t speculate about the reason behind the deployment of the Electronic Warfare with alleged Cyber-Attack capabilities (that could be particularly useful against certain threats these days…) aircraft south of the DMZ,” Cenciotti states. “However, the presence of such a specialised and somehow rare aircraft in the Korean peninsula, that joins several other intelligence gathering aircraft operating over South Korea amid raising tensions for quite some time, is at least worth of note.”
Infowars reached out to the U.S. Air Force for comment but did not receive a response as of writing. The aircraft’s deployment comes as the Pentagon quietly prepares for a potential conflict with North Korea. President Trump denied in a telephone call with South Korean President Moon Jae-in last week that the U.S. was considering an attack on North Korea after reports claimed the White House was debating a “bloody nose” strike on sites across the country. Fears over a clash between Pyongyang and Washington D.C. intensified Saturday after a text alert in Hawaii incorrectly warned of an incoming ballistic missile attack.

The Continued Muslim Stranglehold On The Netherlands As Mohammed Is The Most Popular Name For Newborn Boys In Holland For The Second Straight Year!!

New post on Now The End Begins

Mohammed Is Most Popular Name For Newborn Boys In Holland For 2nd Straight Year

by Geoffrey Grider

mohammed-most-popular-boys-name-holland-netherlands-dutch-islam-muslims

Dutch mainstream media reported that Noah was the most popular baby name for boys in the Netherlands, but a little digging turned out a different finding.

EDITOR'S NOTE: If you're a Muslim, there are all types of different ways to take over someone's country without any violence at all at it's completely legal. It's known as biological jihad. Simply emigrate to the country you wish to take over, start having lots of Muslim babies, and in a little more than a generation or two, you'll be in the majority. Then have your people run for office, vote yourself in, and now you and your people are in charge of what used to be your host nation. This is happening now in the Netherlands, but has been going on in England and the UK for almost 20 years. Is it effective? Just ask Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London
The name Noah was putatively considered the most popular boy’s name for 2017, having been given to 635 new-born boys in the Netherlands. But as VoE reports, a journalist from broadcaster Powned did some research into the database, however, and noticed that another name, a non-traditional Dutch name, was slightly more prevalent.
This journalist checked for Mohammed and its alternative spellings. He thus counted: Mohammed 221, Mohamed 211, Muhammed 110, Mohammad 51, Muhammad 43 and reached a total of 636. Other forms like Mohamad, Muhamed, Muhammet, Mouhamed, Muhamad and Mahamuud could not be checked for “privacy reasons”.
Of course, other forms of Noah like Noa and Noach should be checked as well for the sake of fairness: both, however, were not listed according to the Dutch journalist.
The author says, it is the second year in a row that Mohammed is the most popular name for baby boys: In 2016 there were 724 baby’s named Mohammed (or one of it’s Arabic alternatives) in the Netherlands.
He also mentions that the same tendency was seen in England in 2016: It is not Oliver, but Mohammed (with all its permutations), that is the most popular name for baby boys. source